Legal News and Appellate Tips

Each week, TVA appellate attorney Tim Kowal reviews several recent decisions out of the appellate courts in California, and elsewhere, and reports about the ones that might help you get an edge in your cases and appeals.

If you would like to receive weekly updates of the articles posted here, click here to sign up for the newsletter.

Tag: Tentative Opinions and Focus Letters

Court allows losing party to dismiss appeal after unfavorable tentative

After the record is filed on appeal, you no longer have an absolute right to dismiss the appeal. So if you decide that the the appeal is not worth the risk of attorneys’ fees or bad precedent, you have to request a dismissal. And last month, the Court of Appeal cautioned that if you wait until the court issues its tentative opinion, it’s probably going to be too late. My plea was: not many courts do litigants the favor of issuing tentatives, so please don’t abuse it. Requesting dismissal after an unfavorable tentative risks ruining it for the rest of us.

But the court in Northgate Gonzalez, LLC v. Realm Real Estate, LLC (D4d2 Jun. 16, 2023 No. E078106) 2023 WL 4042678 (nonpub. opn.) didn’t seem to mind. The trial court entered a preliminary injunction of a development project. After two-and-a-half years on appeal, the Court of Appeal issued a tentative opinion. But before oral argument, the trial court made its injunction permanent, thus mooting the appeal. So Realm requested dismissal, and the Court of Appeal granted it.

Realm already filed a new notice of appeal from the permanent injunction. (No indication which way the Court of Appeal’s tentative went, though.)

Takeaway: If you are appealing from a preliminary injunction, consider also file a petition for a writ of mandate. Otherwise, you might go through two years of briefing only to find your appeal is moot.

Read More
Court refuses to dismiss appeal to avoid unfavorable precedent

Before oral argument in the cannabis-cultivator eviction case of 65283 Two Bunch Palms Building LLC v. Coastal Harvest II, LLC (D4d2 May 5, 2023 No. E076654) --- Cal.Rptr.3d --- (2023) 2023 WL 3268852, the court issued a tentative opinion—partially certified for publication—against the tenant Coastal Harvest. Rather than have to face this unfavorable precedent in future cases, Coastal Harvest moved to dismiss the appeal.

But the court denied the motion. “Appellate courts are disinclined to grant such an “11th hour” request to dismiss an appeal,” the court said. This is especially the case when dismissal for strategic purposes, as seemed to be the case here: “And, appellate courts are generally loath to dismiss an appeal when it appears the dismissal is calculated to derail the creation of unfavorable precedent.”

What was the unfavorable precedent the cannabis-cultivator wanted so badly to avoid? Coastal Harvest argued that a statutory presumption of a one-year lease term applied to agricultural uses. (Civ. Code, §1943; Code Civ. Proc., §1161, subd. (2).) The trial court ruled that the cannabis-cultivation here was not agricultural.

Turns out, the Court of Appeal did not even reach this issue. Still, it appears that Coastal Harvest did not want a published opinion that suggested that “growing cannabis in moveable pots within a wooden floor warehouse was not “agricultural use” because Coastal Harvest was not “cultivating the ground.””

The Upshot:

The time to consider the potential risk of an unfavorable published appellate opinion is before the appellate record is filed. Once the record has been filed, “[a]n appellant may not dismiss an appeal as a matter of right, and we have discretion not to dismiss the appeal.” (Jackpot Harvesting, Inc. v. Applied Underwriters, Inc. (2019) 33 Cal.App.5th 719, 728, fn. 10; see Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.244(c)(2).) Use the time early in the appeal to carefully consider these risks.

Comment:

Many appellate practitioners, this writer included, support the appellate courts’ issuing tentative opinions. But when litigants use them to file strategic motions to dismiss as here, courts may second-guess the practice. Litigants should take care not to abuse tentative opinions—it risks spoiling it for the rest of us.

Read More
Quality and Value of Oral Argument Would Be Enhanced” by Focus Letters or Tentative Opinions, Says Justice Thompson

Trial judges issue tentative decisions, why don’t appellate justices? Justice Thompson draws from his positive experience as a trial judge enjoying improved oral arguments after issuing tentative decisions, and suggests that the Court of Appeal might enjoy the same improvement. But we might have to wait for a “changing of the guard” as younger justices take the bench before seeing a

Read More

Tags

Podcast (129)
Videos (110)
Appealability and Appealable Orders (40)
Anti-SLAPP (29)
Legal Writing (29)
Oral Argument (26)
Mischief (25)
Statements of Decision (25)
Abuse of Discretion (24)
Record on Appeal (23)
Splits of Authority (23)
Unpublished Opinions (22)
Waiver and Forfeiture (22)
Stays on Appeal (22)
Timely and Untimely Appeals (22)
California Supreme Court (21)
Notices of Appeal (21)
Judgment Enforcement (20)
Arbitration (19)
Attorney Fees (18)
Briefing (18)
Sanctions (16)
Trial Strategy (16)
Dismissals (15)
Evidentiary Objections (14)
Dissents (13)
Summary Judgments and Summary Adjudications (13)
Preliminary Injunctions (13)
Appellate Sanctions (13)
Collateral Orders (13)
Writ Petitions (13)
Jurisdiction (12)
Dismissed Appeals (12)
New Trial Motions (12)
Mootness (12)
Timeliness (12)
Civility (12)
Exclusion of Evidence (12)
CCP 998 Offers (11)
Federal Courts (11)
Experts (11)
Posttrial Motions (11)
Family Law (11)
Trial Procedure (11)
Standards of Review (10)
Implied Findings (10)
Motions for Reconsideration (10)
Appellate Briefing (9)
Admission of Improper Evidence (9)
Respondent Arguments (8)
Settlements (8)
Disqualification (8)
Appealability (8)
Default Judgments (7)
Federal Appeals (7)
Ninth Circuit (7)
Trial Irregularities and Structural Errors (7)
Probate Appeals (7)
Finding Compelled as a Matter of Law (Failure of Proof) Standard of Review (7)
Appellate Bonds (7)
Stipulated Judgments (7)
Discovery (7)
Appellate Practice (7)
Pretrial Procedure (7)
Mediation (6)
Ethical Duty of Candor (6)
Disentitlement Doctrine (6)
Substantial Evidence (6)
Petitions for Review (6)
Litigation Tips (6)
Depublished Opinions (6)
Notices of Entry (5)
Trust and Probate (5)
Motions to Vacate and Set Aside Judgments (5)
Summary Judgments (5)
Standing (5)
Demurrers (5)
Excessive Damages (5)
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (5)
Right to Jury Trial (5)
Appeals Treated as Writs (4)
Motions in Limine (4)
Stipulated Reversals (4)
Tentative Rulings (4)
Expert Opinions (4)
Motions to Dismiss (4)
Motions to Vacate (4)
Frivolous Motions (4)
Jury Instructions (4)
Appealable Orders (4)
Prejudicial Error (4)
Frivolous Appeals (3)
Law and Motion (3)
Stays (3)
Writs of Mandamus (CCP 1085) (3)
Juror Peremptory Challenges (3)
Tentative Opinions and Focus Letters (3)
Legal Tech (3)
Recovery of Costs (3)
Summary Judgment (3)
Legal Practice (3)
Standards of Evidence (3)
Amicus Briefs (3)
Class Actions (3)
Forfeiture and Waiver (3)
Jury Waivers (3)
Landlord Tenant (3)
Personal Jurisdiction (3)
Constitutional Law (3)
Pretrial Issues (3)
Court Reporters (2)
Appeals Dismissed (2)
Mistrials (2)
New Trial (2)
Persuasion (2)
Post Reversal Issues (2)
Alter Ego (2)
U.S. Supreme Court (2)
Waiver (2)
Medical Rights (2)
Podcasts (2)
Untimeliness (2)
Premature Appeals (2)
Finality and Final Orders (2)
Comments (2)
Stare Decisis (2)
Invited Error (2)
Pleadings (2)
Attorney Client Privilege (2)
Remote Arguments (2)
ADA and Unruh Accessibility Actions (2)
PAGA Actions (2)
Judicial Admissions (2)
Judicial Bias (2)
Civil Theft (2)
Contempt (2)
Record Designation (2)
Harmless Error (2)
Trial by Reference and Pro Tem Judges (2)
Clear and Convincing (2)
Notice of Appeal (1)
Attorney Feese (1)
Judicial Misconduct (1)
Constitutional Litigation (1)
Summary Reversal (1)
Employment Law (1)
Restraining Orders (1)
Premises Liability (1)
Exhaustion of Remedies (1)
Waived and Forfeiture (1)
Per Se Errors (1)
Review as Writ Petition (1)
Common Interest Doctrine (1)
Incorrect Decisions (1)
Attorney Misconduct (1)
Issue Selection on Appeal (1)
Administrative Law (1)
Anecdotes (1)
Art of Persuasion (1)
Cross-Appeals (1)
Summary Reversals (1)
Treble Damages (1)
Trial Tips (1)
Legal News (1)
Erie Problems (1)
Memorandum Opinions (1)
Judicial Philosophy (1)
Free Exercise (1)
PAGA Attorney Fees (1)
Referral Fees (1)
Nonsuit (1)
Closing Argument (1)
Post-Appellate Issues (1)
Settled Statements (1)
Nonsuits JNOVs and 631.8 Judgments (1)
Preclusion (1)
Covid (1)
State Civil Procedure Comparison Project (1)
Typography (1)
Split of Authority (1)
Judicial Notice (1)
Petitions for Rehearing (1)
Split Decisions (1)
Unsupported Arguments (1)
Inconsistent Verdicts (1)
Punitive Damages (1)
Dicta (1)
Post Reversal (1)
Family Court (1)
Out-of-State Litigant (1)
Typeface (1)
Judicial Estoppel (1)
Attorney Fees - CCP 1021.5 (1)
Precedent (1)
Moot Appeals (1)
New Arguments (1)
Third Parties and Nonparties (1)
Ninth CircuitAbuse of Discretion (1)
PostJudgment Litigation (1)
Forfeiture (1)
DismissalsAppealability and Appealable Orders (1)
Trade Restraints (1)
Law of the Case (1)
Record (1)
Designating the Record (1)
Clerks Service of File Stamped Judgment (1)
Bankruptcy (1)
Local Rules (1)
Evidentiary Presumptions (1)
Product Liability (1)
Civil Code 3334 (1)
Consenting to Judgments (1)
Juror Misconduct (1)
Support Awards (1)
Motions to Quash (1)
Inherent Authority (1)
Motions for Judgment on the Pleadings (1)
Property Rights (1)
Trespass (1)
Benefits Obtained Trespass Damages (1)
Landlore Tenant (0)
Retainer Agreements (0)
Professional Ethics (0)
No categories Legal Writing (0)
Petitionf ro Review (0)
Appellate (0)
crossmenuchevron-downThe owner of this website has made a commitment to accessibility and inclusion, please report any problems that you encounter using the contact form on this website. This site uses the WP ADA Compliance Check plugin to enhance accessibility.