Legal News and Appellate Tips

Each week, TVA appellate attorney Tim Kowal reviews several recent decisions out of the appellate courts in California, and elsewhere, and reports about the ones that might help you get an edge in your cases and appeals.

If you would like to receive weekly updates of the articles posted here, click here to sign up for the newsletter.

Tag: Preclusion

A Dismissed Appeal Is Not “On the Merits” If the Dismissal Was for Mootness

Ever had an appeal dismissed? It hurts. But there may be a silver lining: the underlying judgment may no longer have any preclusive value. That’s what happened in the published opinion in Parkford Owners for a Better Community v. Windeshausen (D3 Jul. 14, 2022 No. C094419) 81 Cal.App.5th 216.

In that case, a neighborhood group challenged the expansion of a storage facility on CEQA grounds. The trial court rejected the challenge, and the neighborhood group appealed. But pending the appeal, the expansion project went forward, rendering the appeal moot, leading the Court of Appeal to dismiss.

So then the neighborhood group challenged the issuance of a business license to the storage facility, this time on zoning grounds.

The storage company filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings on res judicata and preclusion grounds, arguing the issues in the new lawsuit were encompassed in the final judgment. The trial court granted the motion.

But the Court of Appeal reversed. Res judicata and claim preclusion require a final judgment. But here, the prior judgment, though challenged on appeal, was dismissed on mootness grounds. A dismissal solely on mootness grounds does not result in a final judgment “on the merits” as required to apply the doctrine of res judicata or preclusion.

Comment: I am not sure about this holding. When the trial court entered the judgment here, it had preclusive effect. Had the appellant not appealed, it would have retained its preclusive effect. But the court held that merely taking a notice of appeal, but then failing to get a decision before the corpus of the appeal was destroyed (thus rendering the appeal moot), had the result of eliminating the preclusive effect of the judgment. So the appellant gets a free do-over.

Could an appellant get the same result via a dismissal on other technical or procedural grounds other than mootness? What if the appellant files the notice of appeal, but then fails to pay the filing fee? Or fails to designate the record?

I find this outcome so confusing that I wonder that I may be missing something.

Read More

Tags

Podcast (129)
Videos (110)
Appealability and Appealable Orders (40)
Anti-SLAPP (29)
Legal Writing (29)
Oral Argument (26)
Mischief (25)
Statements of Decision (25)
Abuse of Discretion (24)
Record on Appeal (23)
Splits of Authority (23)
Unpublished Opinions (22)
Waiver and Forfeiture (22)
Stays on Appeal (22)
Timely and Untimely Appeals (22)
California Supreme Court (21)
Notices of Appeal (21)
Judgment Enforcement (20)
Arbitration (19)
Attorney Fees (18)
Briefing (18)
Sanctions (16)
Trial Strategy (16)
Dismissals (15)
Evidentiary Objections (14)
Dissents (13)
Summary Judgments and Summary Adjudications (13)
Preliminary Injunctions (13)
Appellate Sanctions (13)
Collateral Orders (13)
Writ Petitions (13)
Jurisdiction (12)
Dismissed Appeals (12)
New Trial Motions (12)
Mootness (12)
Timeliness (12)
Civility (12)
Exclusion of Evidence (12)
CCP 998 Offers (11)
Federal Courts (11)
Experts (11)
Posttrial Motions (11)
Family Law (11)
Trial Procedure (11)
Standards of Review (10)
Implied Findings (10)
Motions for Reconsideration (10)
Appellate Briefing (9)
Admission of Improper Evidence (9)
Respondent Arguments (8)
Settlements (8)
Disqualification (8)
Appealability (8)
Default Judgments (7)
Federal Appeals (7)
Ninth Circuit (7)
Trial Irregularities and Structural Errors (7)
Probate Appeals (7)
Finding Compelled as a Matter of Law (Failure of Proof) Standard of Review (7)
Appellate Bonds (7)
Stipulated Judgments (7)
Discovery (7)
Appellate Practice (7)
Pretrial Procedure (7)
Mediation (6)
Ethical Duty of Candor (6)
Disentitlement Doctrine (6)
Substantial Evidence (6)
Petitions for Review (6)
Litigation Tips (6)
Depublished Opinions (6)
Notices of Entry (5)
Trust and Probate (5)
Motions to Vacate and Set Aside Judgments (5)
Summary Judgments (5)
Standing (5)
Demurrers (5)
Excessive Damages (5)
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (5)
Right to Jury Trial (5)
Appeals Treated as Writs (4)
Motions in Limine (4)
Stipulated Reversals (4)
Tentative Rulings (4)
Expert Opinions (4)
Motions to Dismiss (4)
Motions to Vacate (4)
Frivolous Motions (4)
Jury Instructions (4)
Appealable Orders (4)
Prejudicial Error (4)
Frivolous Appeals (3)
Law and Motion (3)
Stays (3)
Writs of Mandamus (CCP 1085) (3)
Juror Peremptory Challenges (3)
Tentative Opinions and Focus Letters (3)
Legal Tech (3)
Recovery of Costs (3)
Summary Judgment (3)
Legal Practice (3)
Standards of Evidence (3)
Amicus Briefs (3)
Class Actions (3)
Forfeiture and Waiver (3)
Jury Waivers (3)
Landlord Tenant (3)
Personal Jurisdiction (3)
Constitutional Law (3)
Pretrial Issues (3)
Court Reporters (2)
Appeals Dismissed (2)
Mistrials (2)
New Trial (2)
Persuasion (2)
Post Reversal Issues (2)
Alter Ego (2)
U.S. Supreme Court (2)
Waiver (2)
Medical Rights (2)
Podcasts (2)
Untimeliness (2)
Premature Appeals (2)
Finality and Final Orders (2)
Comments (2)
Stare Decisis (2)
Invited Error (2)
Pleadings (2)
Attorney Client Privilege (2)
Remote Arguments (2)
ADA and Unruh Accessibility Actions (2)
PAGA Actions (2)
Judicial Admissions (2)
Judicial Bias (2)
Civil Theft (2)
Contempt (2)
Record Designation (2)
Harmless Error (2)
Trial by Reference and Pro Tem Judges (2)
Clear and Convincing (2)
Notice of Appeal (1)
Attorney Feese (1)
Judicial Misconduct (1)
Constitutional Litigation (1)
Summary Reversal (1)
Employment Law (1)
Restraining Orders (1)
Premises Liability (1)
Exhaustion of Remedies (1)
Waived and Forfeiture (1)
Per Se Errors (1)
Review as Writ Petition (1)
Common Interest Doctrine (1)
Incorrect Decisions (1)
Attorney Misconduct (1)
Issue Selection on Appeal (1)
Administrative Law (1)
Anecdotes (1)
Art of Persuasion (1)
Cross-Appeals (1)
Summary Reversals (1)
Treble Damages (1)
Trial Tips (1)
Legal News (1)
Erie Problems (1)
Memorandum Opinions (1)
Judicial Philosophy (1)
Free Exercise (1)
PAGA Attorney Fees (1)
Referral Fees (1)
Nonsuit (1)
Closing Argument (1)
Post-Appellate Issues (1)
Settled Statements (1)
Nonsuits JNOVs and 631.8 Judgments (1)
Preclusion (1)
Covid (1)
State Civil Procedure Comparison Project (1)
Typography (1)
Split of Authority (1)
Judicial Notice (1)
Petitions for Rehearing (1)
Split Decisions (1)
Unsupported Arguments (1)
Inconsistent Verdicts (1)
Punitive Damages (1)
Dicta (1)
Post Reversal (1)
Family Court (1)
Out-of-State Litigant (1)
Typeface (1)
Judicial Estoppel (1)
Attorney Fees - CCP 1021.5 (1)
Precedent (1)
Moot Appeals (1)
New Arguments (1)
Third Parties and Nonparties (1)
Ninth CircuitAbuse of Discretion (1)
PostJudgment Litigation (1)
Forfeiture (1)
DismissalsAppealability and Appealable Orders (1)
Trade Restraints (1)
Law of the Case (1)
Record (1)
Designating the Record (1)
Clerks Service of File Stamped Judgment (1)
Bankruptcy (1)
Local Rules (1)
Evidentiary Presumptions (1)
Product Liability (1)
Civil Code 3334 (1)
Consenting to Judgments (1)
Juror Misconduct (1)
Support Awards (1)
Motions to Quash (1)
Inherent Authority (1)
Motions for Judgment on the Pleadings (1)
Property Rights (1)
Trespass (1)
Benefits Obtained Trespass Damages (1)
Landlore Tenant (0)
Retainer Agreements (0)
Professional Ethics (0)
No categories Legal Writing (0)
Petitionf ro Review (0)
Appellate (0)
crossmenuchevron-downThe owner of this website has made a commitment to accessibility and inclusion, please report any problems that you encounter using the contact form on this website. This site uses the WP ADA Compliance Check plugin to enhance accessibility.