Legal News and Appellate Tips

Each week, TVA appellate attorney Tim Kowal reviews several recent decisions out of the appellate courts in California, and elsewhere, and reports about the ones that might help you get an edge in your cases and appeals.

If you would like to receive weekly updates of the articles posted here, click here to sign up for the newsletter.

Tag: Free Exercise

Covid-restrictions on churches likely unconstitutional where secular establishes are exempted, says Cal. Court of Appeal

A trial court hit Calvary Chapel with over $30,000 in sanctions for violating court injunctions that required the church to comply with local Covid restrictions. The church steadfastly refused to enforce the state and local rules that imposed capacity limitations on indoor gatherings, and that required face masks and the submission of a social-distancing protocol. The court enjoined the church to follow the protocols, on pain of daily sanctions.

The church petitioned the Court of Appeal for review from the contempt orders. And in People v. Calvary Chapel San Jose (D6 Aug. 15, 2022 No. H048708) 82 Cal.App.5th 235, the Sixth District agreed with the church.

The Court of Appeal held that the capacity restriction could not satisfy strict scrutiny, because the restriction exempted secular activities like bus stations, airports, grocery stores, restaurants, office buildings, and retail stores. “We are mindful,” said the Sixth District, “that in Tandon, the Supreme Court stated that “at-home religious exercise” was comparable for purposes of the Free Exercise Clause to “hair salons, retail stores, personal care services, movie theaters, private suites at sporting events and concerts, and indoor restaurants.” [Citation.]”

In fact, the prosecution did even not dispute that the capacity limitations could satisfy strict scrutiny review.

Takeaway:

If you are interested in how the U.S. Supreme Court has dealt with church challenges to Covid restrictions, the Sixth District Court of Appeal provides a good summary.

In short, the courts must be very suspicious where Covid restrictions are enforced as against churches but exempted as against secular establishments. The Constitution assumes that churches are treated as out-groups, and exemptions raise the specter of favorable treatment toward in-groups. This obliterates the Employment Division v. Smith rule that religions organizations are subject to generally-applicable rules, and restores the pre-Smith strict-scrutiny analysis.

Read More

Tags

Podcast (129)
Videos (110)
Appealability and Appealable Orders (40)
Legal Writing (29)
Anti-SLAPP (29)
Oral Argument (26)
Mischief (25)
Statements of Decision (25)
Abuse of Discretion (24)
Splits of Authority (23)
Record on Appeal (23)
Waiver and Forfeiture (22)
Timely and Untimely Appeals (22)
Unpublished Opinions (22)
Stays on Appeal (22)
Notices of Appeal (21)
California Supreme Court (21)
Judgment Enforcement (20)
Arbitration (19)
Attorney Fees (18)
Briefing (18)
Sanctions (16)
Trial Strategy (16)
Dismissals (15)
Evidentiary Objections (14)
Writ Petitions (13)
Summary Judgments and Summary Adjudications (13)
Dissents (13)
Collateral Orders (13)
Appellate Sanctions (13)
Preliminary Injunctions (13)
Mootness (12)
Civility (12)
Timeliness (12)
Exclusion of Evidence (12)
Dismissed Appeals (12)
Jurisdiction (12)
New Trial Motions (12)
Posttrial Motions (11)
Experts (11)
Family Law (11)
Trial Procedure (11)
CCP 998 Offers (11)
Federal Courts (11)
Motions for Reconsideration (10)
Standards of Review (10)
Implied Findings (10)
Admission of Improper Evidence (9)
Appellate Briefing (9)
Respondent Arguments (8)
Disqualification (8)
Appealability (8)
Settlements (8)
Discovery (7)
Ninth Circuit (7)
Stipulated Judgments (7)
Finding Compelled as a Matter of Law (Failure of Proof) Standard of Review (7)
Pretrial Procedure (7)
Probate Appeals (7)
Appellate Bonds (7)
Default Judgments (7)
Appellate Practice (7)
Trial Irregularities and Structural Errors (7)
Federal Appeals (7)
Disentitlement Doctrine (6)
Substantial Evidence (6)
Litigation Tips (6)
Mediation (6)
Petitions for Review (6)
Depublished Opinions (6)
Ethical Duty of Candor (6)
Trust and Probate (5)
Excessive Damages (5)
Summary Judgments (5)
Standing (5)
Right to Jury Trial (5)
Demurrers (5)
Motions to Vacate and Set Aside Judgments (5)
Notices of Entry (5)
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (5)
Appealable Orders (4)
Stipulated Reversals (4)
Jury Instructions (4)
Appeals Treated as Writs (4)
Motions in Limine (4)
Motions to Dismiss (4)
Expert Opinions (4)
Frivolous Motions (4)
Motions to Vacate (4)
Prejudicial Error (4)
Tentative Rulings (4)
Pretrial Issues (3)
Legal Tech (3)
Juror Peremptory Challenges (3)
Writs of Mandamus (CCP 1085) (3)
Class Actions (3)
Personal Jurisdiction (3)
Forfeiture and Waiver (3)
Standards of Evidence (3)
Jury Waivers (3)
Summary Judgment (3)
Landlord Tenant (3)
Frivolous Appeals (3)
Law and Motion (3)
Amicus Briefs (3)
Stays (3)
Tentative Opinions and Focus Letters (3)
Legal Practice (3)
Recovery of Costs (3)
Constitutional Law (3)
Attorney Client Privilege (2)
Civil Theft (2)
Invited Error (2)
Remote Arguments (2)
Appeals Dismissed (2)
Contempt (2)
Post Reversal Issues (2)
ADA and Unruh Accessibility Actions (2)
Court Reporters (2)
Clear and Convincing (2)
Persuasion (2)
Judicial Admissions (2)
U.S. Supreme Court (2)
Judicial Bias (2)
Alter Ego (2)
Medical Rights (2)
Stare Decisis (2)
Trial by Reference and Pro Tem Judges (2)
Harmless Error (2)
Untimeliness (2)
Comments (2)
Pleadings (2)
Record Designation (2)
Mistrials (2)
New Trial (2)
Premature Appeals (2)
Podcasts (2)
Waiver (2)
PAGA Actions (2)
Finality and Final Orders (2)
Inherent Authority (1)
Post-Appellate Issues (1)
Split Decisions (1)
Trial Tips (1)
Juror Misconduct (1)
Evidentiary Presumptions (1)
PAGA Attorney Fees (1)
Referral Fees (1)
Third Parties and Nonparties (1)
Constitutional Litigation (1)
Motions for Judgment on the Pleadings (1)
Post Reversal (1)
Split of Authority (1)
Ninth CircuitAbuse of Discretion (1)
Per Se Errors (1)
Forfeiture (1)
Issue Selection on Appeal (1)
Typeface (1)
Attorney Fees - CCP 1021.5 (1)
PostJudgment Litigation (1)
Typography (1)
Attorney Feese (1)
DismissalsAppealability and Appealable Orders (1)
Nonsuit (1)
Product Liability (1)
Administrative Law (1)
Exhaustion of Remedies (1)
Local Rules (1)
Restraining Orders (1)
Trade Restraints (1)
Covid (1)
Free Exercise (1)
Attorney Misconduct (1)
Nonsuits JNOVs and 631.8 Judgments (1)
Clerks Service of File Stamped Judgment (1)
Treble Damages (1)
Cross-Appeals (1)
Motions to Quash (1)
Precedent (1)
Bankruptcy (1)
Notice of Appeal (1)
Property Rights (1)
Closing Argument (1)
Petitions for Rehearing (1)
Review as Writ Petition (1)
Trespass (1)
Judicial Estoppel (1)
Preclusion (1)
Unsupported Arguments (1)
Benefits Obtained Trespass Damages (1)
Punitive Damages (1)
Summary Reversal (1)
Family Court (1)
Memorandum Opinions (1)
Judicial Misconduct (1)
State Civil Procedure Comparison Project (1)
Employment Law (1)
Law of the Case (1)
Record (1)
Summary Reversals (1)
Anecdotes (1)
Judicial Notice (1)
New Arguments (1)
Erie Problems (1)
Support Awards (1)
Common Interest Doctrine (1)
Settled Statements (1)
Designating the Record (1)
Inconsistent Verdicts (1)
Judicial Philosophy (1)
Waived and Forfeiture (1)
Legal News (1)
Out-of-State Litigant (1)
Consenting to Judgments (1)
Moot Appeals (1)
Art of Persuasion (1)
Dicta (1)
Incorrect Decisions (1)
Premises Liability (1)
Civil Code 3334 (1)
No categories Legal Writing (0)
Appellate (0)
Professional Ethics (0)
Petitionf ro Review (0)
Retainer Agreements (0)
Landlore Tenant (0)
crossmenuchevron-downThe owner of this website has made a commitment to accessibility and inclusion, please report any problems that you encounter using the contact form on this website. This site uses the WP ADA Compliance Check plugin to enhance accessibility.